Preference mapping of different varieties of garlic (Allium sativum)

Authors

  • Zuzana Drdolová Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, Tel.: +421376414608
  • Patrí­cia Martišová Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Technology and Quality and Plant Products, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, Tel.: +421376414608 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7810-6858
  • Lucia Benešová Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76  Nitra,  Tel.: +421 37 641 4608

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5219/1128

Keywords:

garlic, preference mapping, aroma, taste

Abstract

In this work we evaluated different varieties of garlic. All varieties of garlic are rated from one harvest year. Compared samples were different in shape, taste, aroma and characteristics, which were likely to impact on consumer choice and deciding on purchases garlic. Selected indicators were part of internal sensory evaluations, which were evaluated by experts in the sensory laboratory. External part of the preference mapping was conducted among consumers relying on different varieties of garlic under their consumption. Using the internal part of the preferential mapping we summarize randomly selected characteristics within the textural properties and characteristics of taste in which we consider the possible impact on consumer´s choice. In the sensory evaluation assessors used 9 point scale to evaluate 15 selected properties across the texture, taste and aroma on 10 selected varieties according to the degree of preference. Garlic odour and textural properties were evaluated by the normal procedure, though the taste because of intense lingering aftertaste of has been evaluated in a prepared mixture after cooking. For external evaluation, we designed a questionnaire in which consumers can express their preference for individual samples based on photo and variety characteristics, using a hedonic scale from 1 to 9. Obtained data from sensory evaluation and a questionnaire survey were evaluated using statistical software XLSTAT. Preferential map summarise results from internal and external evaluation. We identified characteristics affecting the degree of consumer preferences according to the visualization of our results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aurand, R., Faurobert, M., Page, D., Maingonnat, J. F., Brunel, B., Causse, M., Bertin, N. 2012. Anatomical and biochemical trait network underlying genetic variations in tomato fruit texture. Euphytica, vol. 187, no. 1, p. 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-012-0760-7

Calle, M. M. 2016. HS–GC/MS volatile profile of different varieties of garlic and their behavior under heating. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 408, no. 14, p. 3843-3852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-9477-0

Causse, M., Buret, M., Robini, K., Verschave, P. 2003. Inheritance of nutritional and sensory quality traits in fresh market tomato and relation to consumer preferences. Journal of Food Science, vol. 68, no. 7, p. 2342-2350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb05770.x

Dimitreli, G., Thomareis, A. S. 2007. Texture evaluation of block-type processed cheese as a function of chemical composition and in relation to its apparent viscosity. Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 79, no. 4, p. 1364-1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.04.043

Drdolová, Z., Golian, J., Vietoris, V. 2015. Analysis of the impact of cultivation techniques on chemical and organoleptic properties of selected garlic varieties (Analýza vplyvu pestovateľských techník na chemické a organoleptické vlastnosti vybraných odrôd cesnakov). Zborník – Bezpečnosť potravinového reťazca, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 69-75. (In Slovak)

Hetherington, M. J., MacDougall, D. B. 1992. Optical properties and appearance characteristics of tomato fruit (Lycopersicon esculentum). Journal Science Food Agriculture, vol. 59, no. 4, p. 537-543. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740590417

Jaeger, S. R., Andani, Z., Wakeling, I. N., Macfie, H. J. 1998. Consumer preference for fresh and aged apples: a cross cultural comparison. Food Quality and Preference, vol. 5, no. 9, p. 355-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00031-7

Lado, J., Vicente, E., Manzzioni, A., Ares, G. 2010. Application of a check-all-that-apply question for the evaluation of strawberry cultivars from a breeding program. Journal Science Food Agriculture, vol. 90, no. 13, p. 2268-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4081

Lanzotti, V. 2006. The analysis of onion and garlic. Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1112, no. 2, p. 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2005.12.016

Meullenet, J. F., Xiong, R., Findla, Y. C. 2007. Multivariate and Probabilistic Analyses of Sensory Science Problems. Iowa, USA : Blackwell Publishing Professional, 256 p. ISBN: 978-0-813-80178-0.

Oltman, A. E., Yates, M. D., Drake, M. A. 2016. Preference Mapping of Fresh Market Tomatoes Across 3 Stages of Consumption. Journal of Food Science, vol. 81, no. 6, p. 1495-1505. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13306

Oltman, A. E., Jervis, S. M., Drake, M. A. 2014. Consumer attitudes and preferences for fresh market tomatoes. Journal Food Science, vol. 79, no. 10, p. 2091-2097. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12638

Pagliarini, E., Monteleone, E., Ratti, S. 2001. Sensory profile of 8 tomato cultivars (Lycopersicon esculentum) and its relationship to consumer preference. Italian Journal Food Science, vol. 13, no. 8, p. 285.

Piombino, P., Sinesio, F., Moneta, E., Cammareri, M., Genovese, A., Lisanti, M. T., Mogno, M. R., Peparaio, M., Termolino, P., Moio, L., Grandillo, S. 2012. Investigating physicochemical, volatile, and sensory parameters playing a positive or a negative role on tomato liking. Food Research Internatiol, vol. 50, no. 1, p. 409-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2012.10.033

Risvik, E., McEwan, J. A., Rødbotten, M. 1997. Evaluation of sensory profiling and projective mapping data. Food quality and preference, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(96)00016-X

Sinesio, F., Cammareri, M., Moneta, E., Navez, B., Peparaio, M., Causse, M., Grandillo, S. 2010. Sensory quality of fresh French and Dutch market tomatoes: a preference mapping study with Italian consumers. Journal of Food Science, vol. 75, no. 1, p. 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01424.x

Vietoris, V., Drdolová, Z., Kozelová, D., Balková, H., Dráb, Š., Ivanišová, E. 2014. Preference mapping of salted potato chips in Slovakia and Czech Republic. Selye e-studies, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 33-40.

Villamor, R. R., Daniels, C. H., Moore, P. P., Ross, C. F. 2013. Preference mapping of frozen and fresh raspberries. Journal Food Science, vol. 78, no. 6, p. 911-919. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12125

Published

2019-05-28

How to Cite

Drdolová, Z., Martišová, P., & Benešová, L. (2019). Preference mapping of different varieties of garlic (Allium sativum) . Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 13(1), 385–389. https://doi.org/10.5219/1128

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>