Authentication of poultry products at the breed level using genetic markers

Authors

  • Ľubomí­r Belej Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, Tel.: +421 37 641 5824 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8523-6650
  • Lukáš Jurčaga Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, Tel.: +421907 334 980
  • Slavomí­r Mindek Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, Tel.: +421 37 641 4464
  • Cyril Hrnčár Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Small Animal Science,, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, Tel.: +421 37 641 4744
  • Jozef Čapla Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, Tel.: +421 37 641 4371 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9475-6359
  • Peter Zajác Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, Tel.: +421 37 641 4371 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4425-4374
  • Lucia Benešová Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, Tel.: +421 37 641 4608
  • Radoslav Židek Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, Tel.: +421 37 641 4610 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4751-1257
  • Jozef Golian Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, Tel.: +421 37 641 4325

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5219/1254

Keywords:

Oravka, microsatellite, marker, DAPC, cluster

Abstract

The Oravka tawny is a Slovak national breed of chicken. This breed has combined utility, which means it is valuable for both its meat and eggs. The Oravka tawny is linked to a specific region, Orava, and therefore these products could be protected by European geographical indication. The labeling and sale of chicken meat by the traditional breed of origin are widely used to promote quality and attract those products in the marketplace. For that use, we created the system and method of authentication that can reliably distinguish between the Oravka tawny, other chicken breeds, and other of Oravka”™s colorful characters. In our research, we analyzed 153 chicken feathers from the Oravka breed as well as from breeds used in the process of breeding the Oravka to their current state. They were divided into nine populations. To separate those populations, we used seven microsatellite markers recommended by FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) and other authors. To create separate clusters of individual breeds, we used DAPC (discriminant analysis of principal components) analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aung, M. M., Chang, Y. S. 2014. Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectives. Food Control, vol. 39, p. 172-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.11.007

Bowcock, A. M., Ruiz-Linares, A., Tomfohrde, J., Minch, E., Kidd, J. R., Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. 1994. High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature, vol. 368, p. 455-457. https://doi.org/10.1038/368455a0

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 of 15 December 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) OJ L 368, 23.12.2006, p. 15-73

DeMarco, M., Dalmasso, A., Bottero, M. T., Pattono, D., Sponza, S., Sacchi, P., Rasero, R., Sartore, S., Soglia, D., Giacobini, M., Bertolotti, L., Bjardi, P., Zoccarato, I., Gasco, L., Brugiapaglia, A., Tarantola, M., Schiavone, A. 2013. Local poultry breed assessment in Piemonte (north-west Italy). Proceedings of the 8th European Symposium on Poultry Genetics, 71 p.

Directive 2003/89/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 November 2003 amending Directive 2000/13/EC as regards indication of the ingredients present in foodstuffs.

Duforet-Frebourg, N., Bazin, E., Blum, M. G. B. 2014. Genome scans for detecting footprints of local adaptation using a Bayesian factor model. Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 31, no. 9, p. 2483-2495. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu182

FAO. 2011. Molecular genetic characterization of animal genetic resources. Available at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2413e/i2413e00.pdf.

Fujihara, N. 1999. Poultry Genetic Resources and Conservation Biology. Japanese poultry science, vol. 36, no. 3, p. 127-147. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.36.127

Gärke, C., Ytournel, F., Bed´hom, B., Gut, I., Lathrop, M., Weigend, S., Simianer, H. 2012. Comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for assessing the genetic structure of chicken populations. Animal Genetics, vol. 43, no. 4, p. 419-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02284.x

Granevitze, Z., Hillel, J., Chen, G. H., Cuc, N. T. K., Feldman, M., Eding, H., Weigend, S. 2007. Genetic diversity within chicken populations from different continents and management histories. Animal Genetics, vol. 38, no. 6, p. 576-583. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01650.x

Guidobono Cavalchini, L., Marelli, S. P., Strillacci, M. G., Cozzi, M. C., Polli, M., Longeri, M. 2007. Heterozygosity analysis of Bionda Piemontese and Bianca di Saluzzo chicken breeds by microsatellites markers: A preliminary study. Italian Journal of Animal Science, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 63-65. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.63

Hrnčár, C., Gašparovič, M., Hanusova, E., Hanus, A., Pistová, V., Arpasova, H., Fik, M., Bujko, J., Gasparik, J. 2017. Analysis of Changes in Egg Quality of Autochthonous Chicken Breed Oravka Analysis of Changes in Egg Quality of Autochthonous Chicken Breed Oravka during Laying Period. Animal Scince and Biotechnologies, vol. 50, 229-233.

Cheftel, J. C. 2005. Food and nutrition labelling in the European Union. Food Chemistry, vol. 93, no. 3, p. 531-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.11.041

Jorde, L. B., Watkins, W. S., Bamshad, M. J., Dixon, M. E. 2000. The distribution of human genetic diversity: A comparison of mitochondrial, autosomal, and Y-chromosome data. American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 66, no. 3, p. 979-988. https://doi.org/10.1086/302825

Kasarda, R., Moravčíková, N., Židek, R., Mészáros, G., Kadlečík, O., Trakovická, A., Pokorádi, J. 2015. Investigation of the genetic distances of bovids and cervids using BovineSNP50k BeadChip. Archives Animal Breeding, vol. 58, no. 1, p. 57-63. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-58-57-2015

Khanyile, K. S., Dzomba, E. F., Muchadeyi, F. C. 2015. Population genetic structure, linkage disequilibrium and effective population size of conserved and extensively raised village chicken populations of Southern Africa. Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 5, p. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00013

Kukučková, V., Moravčíková, N., Curik, I., Simčič, M., Mészáros, G., Kasarda, R. 2018. Genetic diversity of local cattle. Acta Biochimica Polonica, vol. 65, no. 3, p. 421-424. https://doi.org/10.18388/abp.2017_2347

Kumar, V., Shukla, S. K., Mathew, J., Sharma, D. 2015. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure Analysis Between Indian Red Jungle Fowl and Domestic Chicken Using Microsatellite Markers. Animal Biotechnology, vol. 26, no. 3, p. 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2014.983645

Choi, N. R., Seo, D. W., Jemaa, S. B., Sultana, H., Heo, K. N., Jo, C., Lee, J. H. 2015. Discrimination of the commercial Korean native chicken population using microsatellite markers. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, vol. 57, no. 1, p. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-015-0044-6

Lockley, A. K., Bardsley, R. G. 2000. DNA-based methods for food authentication. Trends in Food Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(00)00049-2

Moravíková, N., Simčič, M., Mészáros, G., Sölkner, J., Kukučková, V., Vlček, M., Trakovická, A., Kadlečík, O., Kasarda, R. 2018. Genomic response to natural selection within alpine cattle breeds. Czech Journal of Animal Science, vol. 63, no. 4, p. 136-143. https://doi.org/10.17221/62/2017-CJAS

Rogers, A. R., Jorde, L. B. 1996. Ascertainment bias in estimates of average heterozygosity. American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 58, no. 5, p. 1033-1041.

Rosenberg, N. A., Pritchard, J. K., Weber, J. L., Howard, M. C., Kidd, K. K., Zhivotovsky, L. A., Feldman, M. W. 2002. Genetic structure of human populations. Science, vol. 298, no. 5602, p. 2381-2385. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078311

Seo, D. W., Hoque, M. R., Choi, N. R., Sultana, H., Park, H. B., Heo, K. N., Kang, B. S., Lim, H. T., Lee, S. H., Jo, C., Lee, J. H. 2013. Discrimination of Korean native chicken lines using fifteen selected microsatellite markers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, vol. 26, no. 3, p. 316-322. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12469

Yacoub, H. A., Fathi, M. M. 2013. Phylogenetic analysis using d-loop marker of mtDNA of Saudi native chicken strains. Mitochondrial DNA, vol. 24, no. 5, p. 538-551. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2013.770494

Zanetti, E., De Marchi, M., Dalvit, C., Cassandro, M. 2010. Genetic characterization of local italian breeds of chickens undergoing in situ conservation. Poultry Science, vol. 89, no. 3, p. 420-427. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00324

Published

2019-12-28

How to Cite

Belej, Ľubomí­r ., Jurčaga, L., Mindek, S., Hrnčár, C., Čapla, J., Zajác, P., Benešová, L., Židek, R., & Golian, J. (2019). Authentication of poultry products at the breed level using genetic markers. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 13(1), 956–960. https://doi.org/10.5219/1254

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >>