The effect of post-harvest treatment on the quality of sweet cherries during storage

Authors

  • Miroslav Horák Faculty of Horticulture, Mendel University in Brno, Department of Post-Harvest Technology of Horticultural Products, Valtická 337, 691 44 Lednice
  • Jan Goliáš Faculty of Horticulture, Mendel University in Brno, Department of Post-Harvest Technology of Horticultural Products, Valtická 337, 691 44 Lednice
  • Pavel Hí­c Faculty of Horticulture, Mendel University in Brno, Department of Post-Harvest Technology of Horticultural Products, Valtická 337, 691 44 Lednice
  • Anna Němcová Faculty of Horticulture, Mendel University in Brno, Department of Post-Harvest Technology of Horticultural Products, Valtická 337, 691 44 Lednice
  • Jana Kulichová Faculty of Horticulture, Mendel University in Brno, Department of Post-Harvest Technology of Horticultural Products, Valtická 337, 691 44 Lednice

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5219/667

Keywords:

Prunus avium L., sweet cherries, Xtend, carbon dioxide, weight loss

Abstract

Cherries are a traditional commodity grown in the Czech Republic. Placing into a cold room is essential for the fruit to be preserved in the long term. Even if optimum storage conditions are followed, the shelf life is relatively short. This study observed the effect of packing cherries into the Xtend polymer wrap on slowing down the degradation of the fruit during the storage period. The experiment was conducted using 4 varieties of the sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) from the identical site (Stošíkovice, Czech Republic) - 'Vanda', 'Kordia', 'Sweetheart' and 'Regina'. Part of the fruit was stored at 20 °C for 7 days (conditions in retail chains) and other part of the fruit was stored at 1 °C for 50 days, first half of fruit was stored in Xtend polymer wrap and second half in the normal air conditions. Changes were also investigated in fruit quality parameters (soluble solids, titratable acidity, weight loss, peel firmness and respiration intensity) under the shelf life conditions when the fruit was placed at the distribution temperature of 20 °C after removal from the store and analysed after 5 and 10 days. Packed fruit exhibited significantly lower weight loss than unpacked fruit. Unpacked fruits showed visible signs of wilting and it is connected to the water loss and loss of turgidity of fruit. Soluble solids content and titratable acidity reduced generally less in unpacked fruit, which was probably related to the higher weight loss in this variant. Between the packaged and control fruit firmness was not statistically significant. Carbon dioxide production characteristic the intensity of respiration was typically higher at 1 °C for fruit packed in the Xtend film. This fruit, however, largely responded by reducing the intensity of respiration when removed from the store and placed at 20 °C, whereas in unpacked fruit there was a several-fold increase in carbon dioxide production under such conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ben, J. 1991. Studies on short-term storage of Lutówka sour cherry in a cold store. In Abstracts of the 23rd International. Horticultural Congress, Florence, 27. August-1. September, p. 669.

Ceponis, M. J., Cappellini, R. A., Lightner, G. W. 1987. Disorders in sweet cherry and strawberry shipment market, 1972-1984. Plant Disease, vol. 71, no. 5, p. 472-475.

Crisosto, C. H., Crisosto, G. M., Metheney, P. 2003. Consumer acceptance of 'Brooks' and 'Bing' cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color. Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 159-167. https:/doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00173-4

Crisosto, C. H., Garner, D., Doyle, J., Day, K. R. 1993. Relationship between fruit respiration, bruising susceptibility, and temperature in sweet cherries. Hort. Science, vol. 28, no. 2, p. 132-135.

Harb, J., Saquet, A., Bisharat, R., Streif, J. 2006. Quality and biochemical changes of sweet cherries cv. Regina stored in modified atmosphere packaging. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality, vol. 80, no. 2, p. 145-149.

Jacob, R. A., Spinozzi, G. M., Simon, V. A., Kelley, D. S., Prior, R. L., Hess-Pierce, B., Kader, A. A. 2003. Consumption of cherries lowers plasma urate in healthy women. Journal of Nutrition, vol. 133, no. 6, p. 1826-1829.

Kang, S. Y., Seeram, N. P., Nair, M. G., Bourquin, L. D. 2003. Tart cherry anthocyanins inhibit tumor development in ApcMin mice and reduce proliferation of human colon cancer cells. Cancer Letters, vol. 194, no. 1, p. 13-19. https:/doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00583-9

Liu, Y., Liu, X., Zhong, F., Tian, R., Zhang, K., Zhang, X., Li, T. 2011. Comparative study of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in different species of cherries. Journal of Food Science, vol. 76, no. 4, p. 633-638. https:/doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02150.x

PMid:22417346

Looney, N. E., Webster, A. D., Kupferman, E. M. (eds.). 1996. Cherries: crop physiology, production and uses. Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CAB International. ISBN-13: 978-0851989365

Lurie, S., Weksler, A. 2008. Optimizing short term storage of sour cherries. Acta Horticulturae, vol. 795, no. 2, p. 799-804. https:/doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.795.128

Padilla-Zakour, O. I., Tandom, K. S., Wargo, J. M. 2004. Quality of modified atmosphere packaged ´Hedelfingen´ and ´Lapins´ sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.). Hort. Technology, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 331-337.

Petersen, M. B., Poll, L. 1999. The influence of storage on aroma, soluble solids, acid and colour of sour cherries (Prunus cerasus L.) cv. Stevnsbær. European Food Research and Technology, vol. 209, no. 3-4, p. 251-256. https:/doi.org/10.1007/s002170050488

Shick, J. L. and Toivonen, P. M. A. 2002. Reflective traps at harvest reduce stem browning and improve fruit quality of cherries during subsequent storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 25, p. 117-121. https:/doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00145-4

Smith, E. D., Whiting, M. D. 2011. The pedicel's role in postharvest weight loss of two sweet cherry cultivars. Acta Horticulturae, vol. 903, no. 2, p. 935-939. https:/doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.903.131

Turner, J., Seavert, C., Colonna, A., Long, L. E. 2008. Consumer sensory evaluation of sweet cherry cultivars in oregon, USA. Acta Horticulturae, vol. 795, no. 2, p. 781-786. https:/doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.795.125

Usenik, V., Fajt, N., Mikulic-Petkovsek, M., Slatnar, A., Stampar, F., Veberic, R. 2010. Sweet cherry pomological and biochemical characteristics influenced by rootstock. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 58, no 8, p. 4928-4933. https:/doi.org/10.1021/jf903755b

PMid:20337477

Downloads

Published

2016-11-17

How to Cite

Horák, M. ., Goliáš, J. ., Hí­c, P. ., Němcová, A. ., & Kulichová, J. . (2016). The effect of post-harvest treatment on the quality of sweet cherries during storage. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 10(1), 570–577. https://doi.org/10.5219/667

Most read articles by the same author(s)