Authentication and preference mapping of ham


  • Lucia Benešová Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Food Hygiene and Safety, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, Tel.: +421376414608
  • Jozef Golian Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Food Hygiene and Safety, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, Tel.: +421 37 641 4325
  • Patrí­cia Martišová Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Technology and Quality and Plant Products, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, Tel.:+421376414608
  • Boris Semjon University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, Komenského 73, 041 81 Košice, Slovakia, Tel.: +421903919039
  • Peter Zajác Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, Tel.: +421 37 641 4371
  • Jozef Čapla Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, Tel.: +421 37 641 4371
  • Tomáš Vlčko Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Food Hygiene and Safety, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia



ham, consumer preference, sensory, DNA, animal species


Effective connection between the food industry and consumer demands are specific needs of consumers whitch were monitored in this study by using a preferential mapping method. Preference mapping is based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA), which is performed on preferences ratings given for each product and preferences of each consumer through an online questionnaire. Key features for the consumer choice were colour, odour, consistency, total flavour and overall appearance. We verified the composition and mapped the preferences of 10 hams purchased in Slovakia. In view of the persistence of identified cases of food counterfeiting and meat fraud, intensive monitoring and scrutiny is required through effective and accurate analytical methods, which are crucial for maintaining consumer confidence and ensuring compliance with local legislation and labeling. The reference approach for identifying animal species in food is the PCR method, which is however limited to several animal species, meat types. The use of microarray technology enables the identification of a wider range of animal species and greater user comfort, especially the speed of obtaining the results. It allows 24 animal species to be identified in one analysis in 8 samples at a time. Detection was performed using Chipron LCD Aarray Kit Meat 5.0. In all analyzed samples, components of animal origin were identified in accordance on the packaging of the products. The Meat 5.0 LCD chip, which was used for analysis, has detected the presence of other animal species.


Download data is not yet available.


Azuka, I., Ingrid, H., Georg, H., Andreas, M., Ulrich, B. 2011. Biochip technology for the detection of animal species in meat products. Food Analytical Methods, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 389-398.

Barai, B. K., Nazak, R. R., Singhal, R. S., Kulkarni, P. R. 1992. Approaches to the detection of meat adulteration. Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 3, p. 69-72.

Bertolini, F., Ghionda, M. C., D’Alessandro, D., Geraci, C., Chiofalo, V., Fontanesi, L. 2015. A Next Generation Semiconductor Based Sequencing Approach for the Identification of Meat Species in DNA Mixtures. PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 4, p. e0121701.

Bonany, J., Brugger, C., Buehler, A., Carb´o, J., Codarin, S., Donati, F., Schoorl, F. 2014. Preference mapping of apple varieties in Europe. Food Quality and Preference, vol. 32, p. 317-329.

Bottero, M. T., Dalmasso, A. 2010. Animal species identification in food products: Evolution of biomolecular methods. Veterinary Journal, vol. 190, no. 1, p. 34-38.

Cadena, R. S., Cruz, A. G., Faria, J. A. F., Bolini, H. M. A. 2012. Reduced fat and sugar vanilla ice creams: Sensory profiling and external preference mapping. J. Diary. Sci., vol. 95, p. 4842-4850.

Carbonell, L., Izquierdo, L., Carbonell, I., Costell, E. 2008. Segmentation of food consumers according to their correlations with sensory attributes projected on preference spaces. Food Quality and Preference, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 71-78.

Cravero, D. Cerutti, F., Maniaci, M. G., Barzanti, P., Scaramagli, S., Riina, M. V., Ingravalle, F., Acutis, P. L., Peletto, S. 2019. Evaluation of DNA isolation procedures from meat-based foods and development of a DNA quality score. LWT, vol. 106, p. 64-71.

Engel, E., Nicklaus, S., Septier, C., Salles, C., Le Quéré, J. L. 2001. Evolution of the taste of a bitter Camembert cheese during ripening: characterization of a matrix effect. J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 49, no. 6, p. 2930-2939.

European Commission. 2013. Recommendation 2013/99/EU on a coordinated control plan with a view to establish the prevalence of fraudulent practices in the marketing of certain foods. Available at :

Gaze, L. V., Oliveira, B. R., Ferrao, L. L., Granato, D., Cavalcanti, R. N., Conte J´unior, C. A., Freitas, M. Q. 2015. Preference mapping of dulce de leche commercialized in Brazilian markets. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 98, p. 1443-1454.

Greenhoff, K, MacFie, H. J. H. 1994. Preference Mapping in practice. In MacFie, H. J. H., Thomson, D. M. H. (eds) Measurement of food preferences. Boston, Maryland : Springer, p. 137-166. ISBN 978-1-4613-5908-1.

Günssen, U., Aydin, A., Ovali, B. Coskun, Y. 2006. Cig et ve ısıl islem görmüs set ürünlerinde ELISA teknigi ile farklı et türlerinin tespiti (Determination of different types of meat by using ELISA technique in cig meat and heat treated set products). Istanbul Üniv Vet Fak Derg., vol. 32, p. 45-52. (in Turkish)

Hsieh, Y. H. P. 2006. Meat species identification. Handbook of Food Science. Technology, and Engineering, vol. 1, p. 6.

İlhak, O. I., Arslan, A. 2007. Identification of Meat Species by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Technique. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, vol. 31, no. 3, p. 159-163. Available at:

ISO 8589, 2007. Sensory analysis — General guidance for the design of test rooms. International Standard Organisation.

Jolliffe, I. T., Cadima, J. 2016. Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. In Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, vol. 374, no. 2065, p. 2015-2020.

Kostrzynska, M., Bachand, A. 2006. Application of DNA microarray technology for detection, identification, and characterization of food-borne pathogens. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 1, p. 1-8.

MacFie, H. 2007. Preference mapping and food product development. Consumerled Food Product Development, 2007, p. 551-592.

Mansoor, B., Mohamad, J., Heena, Para, Parveez, A. B., Syed, G., Subha B., Asif, W., Rajesh, Q. 2015. Fraudulent Adulteration Substitution of Meat. Journal of Recent Research and Applied Studies, vol. 2, p. 22-33.

Meullenet, J. F., Xiong. R., Findlay, C. 2007. Multivariate and probabilistic analyses of sensory science problems. Ames, IA : IFT Press. Blackwell Publishing, 256 p. ISBN 978-0-813-80178-0.

Miller, M. B., Tang, Y. W. 2009. Basic concepts of mikroarrays and potential applications in clinical microbiology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., vol. 22, no. 4, p. 611-633.

Montowska, M., Rao, W., Alexander, M. R., Tucker, G. A., Barett, D. A. 2014. Tryptic digestion coupled with ambient desorption electrospray ionization and liquid extraction surface analysis mass spectrometry enabling identification of skeletal muscle proteins in mixtures and distinguishing between beef, pork, horse, chicken, and Turkey meat. Analytical Chemistry, vol. 6, p. 4479-4487.

Myers, M. J., Farrell, D. E., Deaver, C. M., Mason, J., Swaim, H. L., Yancy, H. F. 2010 Detection of rendered meat and bone meals by PCR is dependent on animal species of origin and DNA extraction method. J. Food Prot., vol. 73, no. 6, p. 1090-1096.

Oltman, A. E., Yates, M. D., Drake, M. A. 2016. Preference mapping of fresh tomatoes across 3 stages of consumption. Journal of Food Science, vol. 81, p. 1495-1505.

Özpinar, H. Tezmen, G., Gökçe I., Tekiner, I. H. 2013. Detection of Animal Species in Some Meat and Meat Products by Comparatively Using DNA Microarray and Real Time PCR Methods. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 245-252.

Pereira, F., Carneiro, J., Amorim, A. 2008. Identification of species with DNAbased technology: current progress and challenges. Recent Pat. DNA Gene. Seq., vol. 2, no. 3, p. 187-199.

Şakalar, E., Abasiyanik, M. F., Bektik, E., Tayyrov, A. 2012. Effect of heat processing on DNA quantification of meat species. Journal of Food Science, vol. 77, no. 9, p. N40-N44.

Santillo, A., Albenzio, M. 2015. Sensory Profile and Consumers’ Liking of Functional Ovine Cheese. Foods, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 665-677.

Supeková, S. 2008. Kvalita potravín a "značka kvality SK" z pohľadu spotrebiteľa (Food quality and "SK quality label" from the consumer perspective.). Trendy v potravinárstve, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 5-6.

Villamor, R. R., Daniels, C. H., Moore, P. P., Ross, C. F. 2013. Preference mapping of frozen and fresh raspberries. Journal of Food Science, 78, p. 911-919.

Yosef, T. A. 2014. Food Forensics: Using DNA-Based Technology for the Detection of Animal Species in Meat Products. Nature and Science, vol. 12, p. 82-90.



How to Cite

Benešová, L., Golian, J., Martišová, P., Semjon, B., Zajác, P., Čapla, J., & Vlčko, T. (2019). Authentication and preference mapping of ham. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 13(1), 1051–1056.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >>