Influence of maintenance technology in arid conditions on efficiency of marbled beef production
Keywords:beef, feeding technology, grass-fed, ‘marbled’, meat cattle breeding
In recent years, Russia has been developing domestic single-purpose meat cattle breeding. Some livestock farms have focused on the production of high-quality grades of raw meat, i.e. ‘marbled’ beef. Meat of that kind is in great demand in the premium meat market. At the same time, production of beef without using steroids and hormonal drugs increases the competitiveness of this product on the world market in countries of the West and the Middle East. Within the framework of our study, an experiment was conducted on Kalmyk cattle in the arid conditions of OAO Kirovskij in the Republic of Kalmykia. Standardized methods of analysis were used. For the experiment, 10-month-old steers were selected and divided into two groups (Control and Test), 30 heads each. They were kept and fed according to different technologies until the age of 19 months. The Test group steers were kept tied up and fed with a diet developed by the Volga Region Research Institute of Manufacture and Processing of Meat-and-Milk Production; the Control group steers were kept according to conventional beef cattle production technology. The wide expansion range and popularity of this cattle breed are caused by the high productivity of steers whether kept tied up or allowed to graze free. The compared qualities of beef obtained from Kalmyk steers proved that keeping them tied up allows increased production efficiency of raw meat which is an important factor for meat production, being intensified in an unstable situation in agriculture
Adeyemi, J. A., Harmon, D. L., Compart, D. M. P., Ogunade, I. M. 2019. Effects of a blend of Saccharomyces cerevisiae-based direct-fed microbial and fermentation products in the diet of newly weaned beef steers: growth performance, whole-blood immune gene expression, serum biochemistry, and plasma metabolome. Journal of Animal Science, vol. 97, no. 11, p. 4657-4667. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz308
Asp, M. L., Richardson, J. R., Collene, A. L., Droll, K. R., Belury, M. A. 2012. Dietary protein and beef consumption predict for markers of muscle mass and nutrition status in older adults. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, vol. 16, p. 784-790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-012-0064-6
Avilés, C., Martínez, A. L., Domenech, V., Peña, F. 2015. Effect of feeding system and breed on growth performance, and carcass and meat quality traits in two continental beef breeds. Meat Science, vol. 107, p. 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.04.016
Basarab, J. A., Price, M. A., Aalhus, J. L., Okine, E. K., Snelling, W. M., Lyle, K. L. 2003. Residual feed intake and body composition in young growing cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, vol. 83, no. 2, p. 189-204. https://doi.org/10.4141/A02-065
Belyaev, A. I., Gorlov, I. F., Levakhin, V. I., Gorbatykh, E. S. 2004. A new inbreeding type of Aberdeen-Angus cattle. Zootechniya, no. 2, p. 4-7. (In Russian)
Burrow, H. M. 2001. Variances and covariances between productive and adaptive traits and temperament in a composite breed of tropical beef cattle. Livestock Production Science, vol. 70, no. 3, p. 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00178-6
Culbertson, M. M., Speidel, S. E., Peel, R. K., Cockrum, R. R., Thomas, M. G., Enns, R. M. 2015. Optimum measurement period for evaluating feed intake traits in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, vol. 93, no. 5, p. 2482-2487. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8364
El-Khadrawy, H. H., Ahmed, W. M., Hanafi, M. 2011. Observations on repeat breeding in farm animals with emphasis on its control. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 1-7.
Fedotova, G. V., Gorlov, I. F., Slozhenkina, M. I., Glushchenko A. V. 2019. Trends in scientific and technical development and increasing the competitiveness of Russian agriculture. Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge, vol. 32, no. 3, p. 251-255.
Frank, D., Ball, A., Hughes, J., Krishnamurthy, R., Piyasiri, U., Stark, J., Watkins, P., Warner, R. 2016. Sensory and flavor chemistry characteristics of Australian beef: influence of intramuscular fat, feed, and breed. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 64, no. 21, p. 4299-4311. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00160
Gorlov, I. F. 2018. Innovative agri-food technologies as the basis for the development of agribusiness in Russia. Agrarian and Food Innovations, no. 1, p. 7-12. (In Russian)
Gorlov, I. F., Mokhov, A. S., Vorontsova, E. S. 2018. Economic and biological peculiarities of golshchinsky breed cows of different ecological-genetic types. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 2562-2570.
Johnson, J. R., Carstens, G. E., Krueger, W. K., Lancaster, P. A., Brown, E. G., Tedeschi, L. O., Anderson, R. C., Johnson, K. A., Brosh, A. 2019. Associations between residual feed intake and apparent nutrient digestibility, in vitro methane-producing activity, and volatile fatty acid concentrations in growing beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, vol. 97, no. 8, p. 3550-3561. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz195
Kayumov, F. 2008. New breed, Russian hornless. Meat Cattle, no. 6, p. 51-52. (In Russian)
Kelly, D. N., Murphy, C., Sleator, R. D., Judge, M. M., Conroy, S. B., Berry. D. P. 2019. Feed efficiency and carcass metrics in growing cattle. Journal of Animal Science, vol. 97, no. 11, p. 4405-4417. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz316
Kenny, D. A., Fitzsimons, C., Waters, S. M., McGee, M. 2018. Invited review: improving feed efficiency of beef cattle - the current state of the art and future challenges. Animal, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 1815-1826. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118000976
Lindholm-Perry, A. K., Cunningham, H. C., Kuehn, L. A., Vallet, J. L., Keele, J. W., Foote, A. P., Cammack, K. M., Freetly, H. C. 2017. Relationships between the genes expressed in the mesenteric adipose tissue of beef cattle and feed intake and gain. Animal Genetics, vol. 48, no. 4, p. 386-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12565
Luo, Y., Wang, B., Liu, C., Su, R., Hou, Y., Yao, D., Zhao, L., Su, L., Jin, Y. 2019. Meat quality, fatty acids, volatile compounds, and antioxidant properties of lambs fed pasture versus mixed diet. Food Science & Nutrition, vol. 7, no. 9, p. 2796-2805. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1039
Makayev, S. A. 2005. Kazakh white-headed cattle and its improvement. Vestnik of the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, no. 1, p. 336-339. (In Russian)
McIvor, J. G., Monypenny, R. 1995. Evaluation of pasture management-systems for beef-production in the semiarid tropics - model development. Agricultural Systems, vol. 49, no. 1, p. 45-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-521X(94)00031-L
Morozova, A. S. 2016. Marble beef is a special meat for gourmets. Meat Technologies, vol. 168, no. 12, p. 26-28.
Prokhorov, I. P., Naumovich, R. V., Mulangi, E. M. F. 2016. Modern technologies for the “marble” beef production. Scientific Almanac, vol. 19, no. 3-5, p. 433-435. (In Russian)
Randelin, A. V., Kaydulina, A. A., Randelina, V. V., Grishin, V. S. 2018. Economic and biological features of Kazakh white-headed and Hereford cows and their crossbreeds. Izvestia of the Lower Volga Agricultural University Complex: Science and Higher Professional Education, vol. 52, no. 4, p. 247-251.
Samikshya, S., Anuradha, G., Neelam, B., Varinder, U. 2019. Seasonal variations in enzyme histochemistry of accessory sex glands in buffalo bull. Indian Journal of Animal Research, vol. 53, no. 10, p. 1329-1334.
Shumilina, E. S., Skvortsova, O. V., Grebenshchikov, A. V. 2012. Prospects for the use of marbled beef in the technology of meat products. Advances in Current Natural Sciences, no. 6, p. 140-142. (In Russian)
Šulcerová, H., Sýkora, V., Nedomova, S., Mihok, M. 2017. Aging of beef rumpsteak on sensory quality, color appereance and texture properties. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 380-385. https://doi.org/10.5219/747
Troy, D. J., Tiwari, B. K., Joo, S. T. 2016. Health implications of beef intramuscular fat consumption. Food Science of Animal Resources, vol. 36, no. 5, p. 577-582. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.5.577
Wang, H., Li, H., Wu, F., Qiu, X., Yu, Z., Niu, W., He, Y., Su, H., Cao, B. 2019. Effects of dietary energy on growth performance, rumen fermentation and bacterial community, and meat quality of Holstein-Friesians bulls slaughtered at different ages. Animals, vol. 9, no. 12, 14 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9121123
Yaremchuk, V. P., Rodin, V. I. 2011. Marble meat is a natural delicacy. Meat Technologies, vol. 168, no. 12, p. 22-23. (In Russian)
How to Cite
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).