Occurrence of Enterococcus spp. isolated from the milk and milk products

Authors

  • Ines Lačanin University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Milk Hygiene and Technology, Palackeho tř. 1/3, 612 42 Brno
  • Marta Dušková University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Milk Hygiene and Technology, Palackeho tř. 1/3, 612 42 Brno
  • Iva Kladnická University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Palackeho tř. 1/3, 612 42 Brno
  • Renáta Karpí­šková University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Milk Hygiene and Technology, Palackeho tř. 1/3, 612 42 Brno

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5219/476

Keywords:

enterococci, PCR, raw cow’s milk, colostrum, whey

Abstract

Enterococcus spp. is the most controversial group of lactic acid bacteria that have been for years ascribed with beneficial or detrimental role in food and feed. The aim of our study was to monitor the occurrence of Enterococcus spp. as the indicator of the contamination from collected samples of raw cow's milk, goat's colostrum and whey (n = 186). Cultures of enterococci were cultivated and purified and identified by the genus-specific and species-specific PCR method (n = 230). Among suspected isolates in total 222 isolates (96.5%) were identified as Enterococcus spp. The results were the same in all samples separately, more than 90% each of them were positive to Enterococcus spp. The results of counting the number of cultivated colonies showed that the largest number of enterococci is found in the samples of whey taken after the process of electrodialysis and the smallest in the native whey sample. From collected whey samples, 64 samples (90%) were PCR positive for enterococci species. Afterwards within the identification of several selected isolates that were identified, as Enterococcus spp. by the species-specific PCR method the most frequently presented in all of isolates was Enterococccus faecalis. Apparently the presence of enterococci was detected in all samples, but in amounts that aren't hazardous for human health. Although enterococci are oportunistic pathogens, it seems that they occur frequently in foods (especially fermented) in large numbers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Citak, S., Gundogan, N., Mend, A., Orhan, S. 2006. Occurence, isolation and antibiotic resistence of Enterococcus species isolated from raw milk samples in Turky. Milchwissenschaft-Milk science international, vol. 61, no. 2, p. 150-152.

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) [online] [cit. 2015-02-02] Available at: http://www.fao.org/home/en/

Foulquié, M. R., Sarantinopoulos, P., Tsakalidou, E., De Vuyst, L. 2006. The role and application of enterococci in food and health. Int. J. Food Microbiol., vol. 106, no. 1, p. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.06.026 PMid:16216368

Franz, C.M.A.P., Huch, M., Abriouel, H., Holzapfel, W., Gálvez, A. 2011. Enterococci as probiotics and their implication in food safety. Int. J. Food Microbiol., vol. 151, no. 2, p. 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.08.014 PMid:21962867

Giraffa, G. 1999. Enterococcus. Encyclopedia of food microbiology. London, UK: Accademic Press, p. 617-624. ISBN 0-12-227070-3 https://doi.org/10.1006/rwfm.1999.0520

Giraffa, G. 2003. Functionality of enterococci in dairy products. Int. J. Food Microbiol., vol. 88, no. 2-3, p. 215-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00183-1

Guo, M. 2003. Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences. Goat / Milk. Fuquay, London, UK: Accademic Press p. 2944-2949. ISBN: 978-0-12-374402-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227055-X/00565-4

Hernández-Castellano, L. E., Morales-delaNuez, A., Sánchez-Macías, D., Moreno-Indias, I., Torres, A., Capote, J., Argüello, A., Castro, N. 2015. The effect of colostrum source (goat vs. sheep) and timing of the first colostrum feeding (2 h vs. 14 h after birth) on body weight and immune status of artificially reared newborn lambs. J. Dairy Sci., vol. 98, no. 1, p. 204-210. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8350 PMid:25468691

ISO 6887-1:1999, Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs - Preparation of tests samples, initial suspension and decimal dilutions for microbiological examination - Part 1: General rules for the preparation of the initial suspension and decimal dilutions.

ISO 7218:2007, Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs - General requirements and guidance for microbiological examinations.

Jackson, C. H., Fedorka-Cray, P. J., Barrett, J. B. 2004. Use of a genus- and species-specific multiplex PCR for identification of enterococci. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 42, no. 8, p. 3558-3565. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.8.3558-3565.2004 PMid:15297497

Jelen, P. Whey processing-Utilization and Products. Fuquay, J. W. Encyclopedia of Dairy Science. London, UK: Academic Press, 2002, p. 2739-2745. ISBN: 978-0-12-374402-9

Kagkli, D. M., Vancanneyt, M., Hill, C., Vandamme, P., Cogan, T. M. 2007. Enterococcus and Lactobacillus contamination of raw milk in a farm dairy environment. Int. J. Food Microbiol., vol. 114, no. 2, p. 243-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.09.016 PMid:17189657

Khan, H., Flint, S., Yu, P. L. 2010. Enterocins in food preservation. Int. J. Food Microbiol., vol. 141, no. 1-2., p. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.03.005 PMid:20399522

Pescuma, M., Hébert, E. M., Mozzi, F., Font de Valdez, G. 2008. Whey fermentation by thermophilic lactic acid bacteria: Evaluation of carbohydrates and protein content. Food Microbiology, vol. 25, no. 3, p. 442-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2008.01.007 PMid:18355669

Pieniz, S., Andreazza, R., Anghinoni, T., Camargo, F., Brandello, A. 2014. Probiotic potential, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Enterococcus durans strain LAB18s. Food Control, vol. 37, p. 251-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.09.055

Salminen, S., Von Wright, A., Ouwehand, A. 2005. Lactic acid bacteria: microbiological and functional aspects, 3rd revised and expanded edition. Clinical Infectious Diseases [online], vol. 40, p. 911-912 [cit. 2015-02-02]. ISSN: 1537-659. Retrieved from the web: http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/40/6/911.full.pdf+html

Tratnik, L. J., Božanić, R. 2012. Milk and milk products. Zagreb, Croatia: Croatian Milk Associations. ISBN 978-953-7472-06-1

Uruakpa, F. O., Ismond, M. A. H., Akobundu, E. N. T. 2002. Colostrum and its benefits: a review. Nutrition Research, vol. 22, no. 6, p. 755-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5317(02)00373-1

Zulueta, A., Maurizi, A., Frígola, A., Esteve, M. J., Coli, R., Burini, G. 2009. Antioxidant capacity of cow milk, whey and deproteinized milk. International Dairy Journal, vol. 19, no. 6-7, p. 380-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2009.02.003

Downloads

Published

2015-07-08

How to Cite

Lačanin, I. ., Dušková, M. ., Kladnická, I. ., & Karpí­šková, R. . (2015). Occurrence of Enterococcus spp. isolated from the milk and milk products. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 9(1), 258–262. https://doi.org/10.5219/476

Most read articles by the same author(s)