Assessment of DNA quality in processed tuna muscle tissues

Authors

  • Zora Piskatá Veterinary Research Institute, Department of Food and Feed Safety, Hudcova 296/70, 621 00 Brno
  • Eliška Pospí­šilová Veterinary Research Institute, Department of Food and Feed Safety, Hudcova 296/70, 621 00 Brno

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5219/612

Keywords:

canned product, fish food, DNA extraction, PCR, Thunnus albacares

Abstract

Authentication of tuna fish products is necessary to assure consumers of accurate labelling of food products. The quality of species specific DNA crucially affects the efficiency of amplification during the subsequent PCR. The problem in DNA detection in canned products lies in the possibility of the fragmentation of DNA during the processing technologies and the use of ingredients (oil, salt, spice), that may inhibit the PCR reaction. In this study three DNA extraction methods were compared: DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit, DNeasy mericon Food Kit and Chemagic DNA tissue 10 Kit. The quantity and quality of DNA were evaluated by measuring DNA concentration and ratios A260/A280. Several parameters were estimated: the effect of whole and mechanically treated muscle, sterilization procedure used in canned process (high temperature in combination with high pressure) and addition of raw materials. The highest DNA concentrations were observed in non-processed muscle that is not influenced by the sterilization process. Canned whole muscle demonstrated lower DNA yield, and furthermore, the mechanical treatment (canned ground) resulted in lower values of DNA concentration that was registered by using all three types of DNA extraction kits. DNeasy mericon Food Kit produced DNA of higher concentration in non-processed sample, Chemagic DNA tissue 10 Kit delivered higher DNA yields than kits DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit and DNeasy mericon Food Kit in canned samples, although the purity was lower, but still within the range 1.7 - 2.0. DNA was considered to be satisfactorily pure in all three types of samples and using all three types of DNA isolation. In case of the samples enriched of ingredients and treated with sterilization process as whole or ground muscle Chemagic DNA tissue 10 Kit produced in all samples (whole and ground muscle) the highest values of DNA concentration, but almost all values of A260/A280 were lower than 1.7. Therefore DNeasy mericon Food Kit appears to be a favorite one, in all samples with whole muscle gives higher values of DNA concentrations than DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit. Addition of ingredients influenced the DNA yield in terms of decreasing in samples containing vinegar and lemon, but some of the ingredients resulted surprisingly in higher yield of DNA. This was not consistent in whole and ground muscle, and the differences were described also among particular kits. The impact of ingredients was not conclusively approved and their importance to the suitability of extracted DNA for PCR amplification is needed to be discussed in further analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bartlett, S. E., Davidson, W. S. 1991. Identification of Thunnus tuna species by the polymerase chain reaction and direct sequence analysis of their mitochondrial cytochrome b genes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 48, p. 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1139/f91-043

Bauer, T., Weller, P., Hammes, W.P., Hertel, C. (2003). The effect of processing parameters on DNA degradation in food. European Food Research Technology, vol. 217, p. 338-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-003-0743-y

Bossier, P. 1999. Authentication of seafood products by DNA patterns. Journal of Food Science, vol. 64, p. 189-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1999.tb15862.x

Bottero, M. T., Dalmasso, A., Cappelletti, M., Secchi, C., Civera, T. 1997. Differentiation of five tuna species by a multiplex primer-extension assay. Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 129, no. 3, p. 575-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.01.032 PMid:17353060

Besbes, N., Fattouch, S., Sadok, S. 2011. Comparison of methods in the recovery and amplificability of DNA from fresh and processed sardine and anchovy muscle tissue. Food Chemistry, vol. 129, p. 665-671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.05.002

Cawthorn, D., Steinman, H. A., Witthuhn, R. C. 2011. Comparative study of different methods for the extraction of DNA from fish species commercially available in South Africa. Food Control, vol. 22, p. 231-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.07.003

Chapela, M. J., Sotelo, C. G., Péez-Martin, R. I., Pardo, M. A., Pérez-Villareal, B., Gilardi, P., Riese, J. 2007. Comparison of DNA extraction methods from muscle of canned tuna for species identification. Food Control, vol. 18, p. 1211-1215. https://doi.org/10.5219/189

Colombo, F., Mangiagalli, G., Renon, P. 2005. Identification of tuna species by computer-assisted and cluster analysis of PCR-SSCP electrophoretic patterns. Food Control, vol. 16, p. 51-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2003.11.006

Dalmasso, A., Civera, T., Bottero, M. T. 2006. Biomolecular approaches for the identification of tuna species. Veterinary Research Communications, vol. 30, p. 179-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-006-0035-7

Di Pinto, A., Forte, V. T., Guastadisegni, M.C., Martino, C., Schena, F.P., Tantillo, G. 2007. A comparison of DNA extraction methods for food analysis. Food Control, vol. 18, p. 76-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.08.011

Espineira, M., Gonzalez-Lavín, N., Vieites, J. M., Santaclara, F. J. 2009. Development of a method for the identification of scombroid and common substitute species in seafood products by FINS. Food Chemistry, vol. 117, p. 698-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.04.087

Lee, K. W., Kang, N. J., Heo, Y. S., Rogozin, E. A., Pugiliese, A., Hwang, M. K., Bowden, G. T., Bode, A. M., Lee, H. J., Dong, Z. 2008. Raf and MEK Protein kinases are direct molecular targets for the chemopreventive effect of quercetin, a major flavonol in red wine. Cancer Research, vol. 68, p. 946-955. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-3140 PMid:18245498

Lin, W. F., Shiau, C. Y., Hwang, D. F. 2005. Identification of four Thunnus tuna species using mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequence and PCR-RFLP analysis. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, vol. 13, p. 382-387.

Lin, W. F. and Hwang, D. F. 2007. Application of PCR-RFLP analysis on species identification of canned tuna. Food Control, vol. 18, p. 1050-1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2006.07.001

Lockley, A. K.; Bardsley, R. G. 2000. DNA-based methods for food authentication. Trends in Food Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(00)00049-2

Lopez, I. and Pardo, M. A. 2005. Application of relative quantification TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction technology for the identification and quantification of Thunnus alalunga and Thunnus albacares. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 53, p. 4554-4560. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0500841 PMid:15913324

Mackie, I. M., Pryde, S. E., Gonzales-Sotelo, C., Medina, I., Peréz-Martín, R., Quinteiro, J., Rey-Mandez M., Rehbein, H. 1990. Challenges in the identification of species of canned fish. Trends in Food Science and Technology, vol. 10, p. 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(99)00013-8

Pardo, M. A., Pérez-Villareal, B. 2004. Identification of commercial canned tuna species by restriction site analysis of mitochondrial DNA products obtained by nested primer PCR. Food Chemistry, vol. 86, p. 143-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.09.024

Ram, J. L., Ram, M. L., Baidoun, F. F. 1996. Authentication of canned tuna and bonito by sequence and restriction site analysis of polymerase chain reaction products of mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 44, p. 2460-2467. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf950822t

Regulation (EC) No 1536/92 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 June 1992 laying down common marketing standards for preserved tuna and bonito. OJ L 163, 17.6.1992, p. 1-4.

Rehbein, H., Mackie, I. M., Pryde, S., Gonzales-Sotelo, C., Medina, I., Perez-Martin, R., Quinteiro, J., Rey-Mendez, M. 1999. Fish species identification in canned tuna by PCR-SSCP: validation by a collaborative study and investigation of intra-species variability of the DNA-patterns. Food Chemistry, vol. 64, p. 263-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00125-3

Santaclara, F. J., Velasco, A., Pérez-Martin, R. I., Quinteiro, J., Rey-Méndez, M., Pardo, M. A., Jimenez, E., Sotelo, C. G. 2015. Development of a multiplex PCR-ELISA method for the genetic authentication of Thunnus species and Katsuwonus pelamis in food products. Analytical Methods, vol. 180, p. 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.076

Takeyama, H., Chow, S., Tsuzuki, H., Matsunaga, T. 2001. Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation within and between tuna Thunnus species and its application to species identification. Journal of Fish Biology, vol. 58, p. 1646-1657. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2001.tb02319.x

Downloads

Published

2016-06-04

How to Cite

Piskatá, Z. ., & Pospí­šilová, E. . (2016). Assessment of DNA quality in processed tuna muscle tissues. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 10(1), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.5219/612