Risk of agricultural production in russian orel region

Authors

  • Marián Tóth Ing. Marián Tóth, PhD. Department of finance FEM SUA in Nitra Tr. A. Hlinku 2 94976 Nitra, Slovakia
  • Vladislav Matveev Orel State Agrarian University
  • Andrea Boháčiková Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Economics and Management, Department of Finance, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976 Nitra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5219/664

Keywords:

Markowitz, profitability, risk, production, price, yield

Abstract

The paper evaluates the risk of agricultural farms in Russian Orel region by using the modified Markowitz portfolio theory. We analyse individual farm data of agricultural animal and crop production with respect to yield, price and revenue agricultural risk. Farms included in the analyses represent four organizational legal forms and the range of agricultural products produced by these farms is wide. Therefore the research focused on the grain and milk production only. Over the period 2010 to 2014 the effects of Russian ban on import of agricultural products from EU can be observed in form of increased price level of individual commodity prices. Risk and return are negatively related and investors are comparing the risk with profitability. The same stands for farmers. They select the type of production based on expected return. The result show that the systemic yield, price and revenue risk of grain production is higher when compared to milk production. This is due the nature of animal and crop production. Climate and weather risk has much lower effect on animal production when compared to crop production. Therefore the overall risk of crop production is higher. But farmers consider the risk not isolated but in relation to profitability. The profitability of crop production is higher as in Orel region more than 90% of agricultural production is not animal related and farms are profitable with and also without subsidies. Our empirical study shows that in case of equal expected profitability animal production is more profitable for the farmer as it is linked to lower yield, price and revenue risk.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gempesaw C. M., Tambe A. M., Nayga R. M., Toensmeyer U. C. 1988. The Single Index Market Model in Agriculture. Northeast Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, vol. 17, p. 147-155.

Hardaker J., Huirne R., Anderson J., Lien G. 2004. Coping with risk in agriculture. CABI Publishing, ISBN 0-85-199973-5. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851998312.0000

Heymann, E. 2007. Climate change and sectors: Some like it hot : working paper. Frankfurt : Deutsche Bank Research.

Holzman R., Jorgensen S. 2001. Social Risk management: A New conceptual framework for social protection, and beyond. International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 529-556. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011247814590

Huirne R., Meuwissen M., Hardaker B., Anderson J. 2000. Risk and risk management in agriculture: an overview and empirical results. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, vol. 1, no. 1-2, p. 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2000.001491

Kahn, B. M., Zaks, D. 2009. Investing in agriculture: Far-Reaching challenge, significant opportunity : working paper. Frankfurt : Deutsche Bank Climate Change Advisors.

Kimura, S., Antón, J., Lrthi, C. 2010. Farm Level Analysis of Risk and Risk Management Strategies and Policies Cross Country Analysis : OECD Food. Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, no. 26, 55 p.

Kubicová, Ľ., Habánová, M. 2012. Development of milk consumption and marketing analysis of its demand. Potravinarstvo, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 66-72. https://doi.org/10.5219/236

Libbin J. D., Kohler J. D., Hawkes J. M. 2004. Does Modern Portfolio Theory Apply to Agricultural Land Ownership? Concepts for Farmers and Farm Managers. Journal of the American Society of Farm managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 67, p. 85-96.

Markowitz H. M. 1952. Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x

Michalski G. 2015. Agency Costs in Small and Medium Wood Industry Enterprises with Full Operating Cycle and Cash Levels. Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 34, p. 461-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01655-X

Miller, A., Dobbins, C., Pritchett, J., Boehlje, M., & Ehmke, C. 2004. Risk management for farmers. Working paper, 04-11.

Mura, L. 2011. Position of competitiveness of Slovak agri-food sector within the V4 countries. Potravinarstvo, vol. 5, p. 170-175. Available online: http://www.potravinarstvo.com/dokumenty/mc_februar_2011/pdf/2/mura.pdf

Mura, L., Buleca, J., Zeleňáková, L., Qineti, A., Kozelová, D. 2012. An analysis of selected aspects of international business in Slovak diaries in EU framework. Mljekarstvo, vol. 62, no. 3, p. 219-226.

Peterson P. E., Luethold R. M. 1987. A portfolio approach to optimal hedging for a commercial cattle feedlot. Journal of Futures Markets, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 443-457. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.3990070407

Sanchirico J. N., Smith M. D., Lipton D. W. 2005. Ecosystem Portfolios: A Finance-Based Approach to Ecosystem Management. In AERE Workshop 2005: Natural Resources at Risk, Jackson : WY, p. 1-33.

Tóth M., Lančarič D., Piterková A. and Savov R. 2014. Systematic risk in Agriculture: A case of Slovakia. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, vol 6, p. 185-193.

Downloads

Published

2016-11-17

How to Cite

Tóth, M. ., Matveev, V. ., & Boháčiková, A. . (2016). Risk of agricultural production in russian orel region. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 10(1), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.5219/664

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.