Texture quality of muskmelons (Cucumis melo L.) From different retailers during storage

Authors

  • Alica Bobková Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra
  • Marek Šnirc Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra
  • Martin Král University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Plant Origin Foodstuffs Hygiene and Technology, Palackého tří­da 1-3, 612 42 Brno
  • Martina Oštádalová University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Plant Origin Foodstuffs Hygiene and Technology, Palackého tří­da 1-3, 612 42 Brno
  • Jana Pokorná University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Plant Origin Foodstuffs Hygiene and Technology, Palackého tří­da 1-3, 612 42 Brno
  • Tomáš Fekete Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra
  • Ľubomí­r Belej Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5219/668

Keywords:

muskmelon fruit, flesh firmness, skin strength

Abstract

The subject of study was to assess and to compare the effect of storage time on flesh firmness and skin strength in muskmelons (Cucumis melo L.) obtained from supermarket and marketplace. Texture quality of fruit is considered to be the major determinant for customer preference that depends on harvesting maturity and proper storage conditions of fruit and its fresh-cuts. Changes in flesh firmness and skin strength were measured periodically in stored fresh-cut fruits in both groups for initial, 2nd, 5th and 6th day. Analysis of basic physical parameters revealed that muskmelons from marketplace had higher height and width perimeter and therefore also a higher weight, compared to those ones from supermarkets. Textural analysis pointed out to significant differences (p <0.05) in flesh firmness among initial day group and all tested groups from 2nd, 5th and 6th day in muskmelons from supermarket. In marketplace muskmelon group was observed significant difference (p <0.05) between samples from initial day and 5th day. Within the skin strength, there were demonstrated significant differences (p <0.05) between initial day and most of remaining storage days in both supermarket and marketplace muskmelons groups. The data for flesh firmness and skin strength were used in linear regression analysis, in order to evaluate trends during storage period. The correlation coefficients of linear model describing relationship between storage time and skin strength for the group of supermarket and marketplace muskmelons were r = -0.828 and r = -0.780, respectively, which indicated approximately equal relationship between time and skin strength in both tested groups. A strong inverse correlation (r = -0.816) between time and flesh firmness in the group of supermarket muskmelons was noticed. In the group of marketplace muskmelons, there was observed weaker inverse correlation (r = -0.441) within this relation, compared to commercial ones. The model revealed that the muskmelons from marketplace retailers tend to maintain the flesh firmness for a longer time than did commercial ones. The melon flesh quality was markedly changing during storage period and highly depends on the muskmelon origin.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Addinsoft. 2014. XLSTAT, Analyse de données et statistique avec MS Excel. Addinsoft, NY, USA.

Aguayo, E., Escalona, V., Rtés, F. 2004. Metabolic Behavior and Quality Changes of Whole and Fresh Processed Melon. Journal of Food Science, vol. 69, no. 4, p. SNQ148-SNQ155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb06356.x

Agar, I., Massantini, R., Hess-Pierce, B., Kader, A. 1999. Postharvest CO2 and Ethylene Production and Quality Maintenance of Fresh-Cut Kiwifruit Slices. Journal of Food Science, vol. 64, no. 3, p. 433-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1999.tb15058.x

Almeida, D., Huber, D. 1999. Apoplastic pH and inorganic ion levels in tomato fruit: A potential means for regulation of cell wall metabolism during ripening. Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 105, no. 3, p. 506-512. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1999.105316.x

Aloni, B., Cohen, R., Karni, L., Aktas, H., Edelstein, M. 2010. Hormonal signaling in rootstock-scion interactions. Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 127, no. 2, p. 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.003

Bianchi, T., Guerrero, L., Gratacós-Cubarsí, M., Claret, A., Argyris, J., Garcia-Mas, J., Hortós, M. 2016. Textural properties of different melon (Cucumis melo L.) fruit types: Sensory and physical-chemical evaluation. Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 201, p. 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.01.028

Bebejová, A., Čapla, J., Zajác, P., Belej Ľ., Čurlej, J. Vietoris, V. 2014. Determination of textural properties of different kinds of ketchups of two different rates under different conditions of storage for the determination of their consumal quality. Potravinarstvo, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 25-32. https://doi.org/10.5219/323

El-Zoghbi, M. 1994. Biochemical changes in some tropical fruits during ripening. Food Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 1, p. 33-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90229-1

Harker, F., Redgwell, R., Hallett, I., Murray, S., Carter, G. 2010. Texture of Fresh Fruit. Janick/Horticultural Reviews, vol. 20, p. 121-224. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470650646.ch2

Harker, F. R., Johnston, J. 2008.Importance of texture in fruit and its interaction with flavor. Brückner, B., Wyllie, S. G. Fruit and vegetable flavour: Recent advances and future prospects. Abington, Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Pub. Ltd. 336 p. ISBN 9781845691837.

Harker, F., Sutherland, P. 1993. Physiological changes associated with fruit ripening and the development of mealy texture during storage of nectarines. Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 269-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-5214(93)90032-x

Ismail, H., Chan, K., Mariod, A., Ismail, M. 2010. Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of cantaloupe (Cucumis melo) methanolic extracts. Food Chemistry, vol. 119, no. 2, p. 643-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.07.023

Kenny, O., Smyth, T., Hewage, C., Brunton, N. 2013.Antioxidant properties and quantitative UPLC-MS analysis of phenolic compounds from extracts of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) seeds and bitter melon (Momordica charantia) fruit. Food Chemistry, vol. 141, no. 4, p. 4295-4302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.016

Lignou, S., Parker, J., Baxter, C., Mottram, D. 2014. Sensory and instrumental analysis of medium and long shelf-life Charentais cantaloupe melons (Cucumis melo L.) harvested at different maturities. Food Chemistry, vol. 148, p. 218-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.10.045

Maran, J., Priya, B. 2015.Supercritical fluid extraction of oil from muskmelon (Cucumis melo) seeds. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, vol. 47, p. 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2014.10.007

Obando, J., Martínez, J., Roca, M., Alarcón, A., Fernández-Trujillo, J., Hernández, M., Eduardo, I., Arús, P., Monforte, A. 2007. Identification of qtls associated with commercial postharvest quality traits and disorders using a collection of near isogenic lines of melon. Acta Horticulture, vol. 763, p. 309-317. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2007.763.41

O'Connor-Shaw, R., Roberts, R., Ford, A., Nottingham, S. 1994. Shelf Life of Minimally Processed Honeydew, Kiwifruit, Papaya, Pineapple and Cantaloupe. Journal of Food Science, vol. 59, no. 6, p. 1202-1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1994.tb14676.x

Oms-Oliu, G., Raybaudi-Massilia Martínez, R., Soliva-Fortuny, R., Martín-Belloso, O. 2008. Effect of superatmospheric and low oxygen modified atmospheres on shelf-life extension of fresh-cut melon. Food Control, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.03.009

Pitrat, M., Hanelt, P., Hammer, K. 2000. Some Comments on Infraspecific Classification of Cultivars of Melon. Acta Horticulturae, vol. 510, p. 29-36. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2000.510.4

Pitrat, M., Chauvet, M. And Foury, C. 1999. Diversity, History and Production of Cultivated Cucurbits. Acta Horticulturae, vol. 492, p. 21-28. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.1999.492.1

Raybaudimassilia, R., Mosquedamelgar, J., Martinbelloso, O. 2008. Edible alginate-based coating as carrier of antimicrobials to improve shelf-life and safety of fresh-cut melon. International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 121, no. 3, p. 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.11.010

Saladie, M., Matas, A., Isaacson, T., Jenks, M., Goodwin, S., Niklas, K., Xiaolin, R., Labavitch, J., Shackel, K., Fernie, A., Lytovchenko, A., O'Neill, M., Watkins, C., Rose, J. 2007. A Reevaluation of the Key Factors That Influence Tomato Fruit Softening and Integrity. Plant Physiology, vol. 144, no. 2, p. 1012-1028. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.097477

Shackel, K., Greve, C., Labavitch, J., Ahmadi, H. 1991. Cell Turgor Changes Associated with Ripening in Tomato Pericarp Tissue. Plant Physiology, vol. 97, no. 2, p. 814-816. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.97.2.814

Solval, K., Sundararajan, S., Alfaro, L., Sathivel, S. 2012. Development of cantaloupe (Cucumis melo) juice powders using spray drying technology. LWT - Food Science and Technology, vol. 46, no. 1, p. 287-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2011.09.017

Starrett, D., Laties, G. 1993. Ethylene and Wound-Induced Gene Expression in the Preclimacteric Phase of Ripening Avocado Fruit and Mesocarp Discs. Plant Physiology, vol. 103, p. 227-234. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.1.227

Supapvanich, S., Tucker, G. 2012. The Effect of 1-Methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) on Quality and Cell Wall Hydrolases Activities of Fresh-Cut Muskmelon (Cucumis melo var. reticulatus L.) During Storage. Food Bioprocess Technol, vol. 6, no. 8, p. 2196-2201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-011-0776-3

Toivonen, P., Brummell, D. 2008. Biochemical bases of appearance and texture changes in fresh-cut fruit and vegetables. Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 48, no. 1, p. 1-14.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.09.004

Van Buggenhout, S., Sila, D., Duvetter, T., Van Loey, A., Hendrickx, M. 2009. Pectins in Processed Fruits and Vegetables: Part III-Texture Engineering. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2009.00072.x

Vouldoukis, I., Lacan, D., Kamate, C., Coste, P., Calenda, A., Mazier, D., Conti, M. and Dugas, B. 2004. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of a Cucumis melo LC. extract rich in superoxide dismutase activity. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 94, no. 1, p. 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2004.04.023

Watada, A., Qi, L. 1999. Quality of fresh-cut produce. Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 201-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-5214(98)00085-4

WORLD CAPITAL, 2016. Cucumis melo L. Available online: http://worldcapital.gr/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/u6712.jpg

Yanty, N., Lai, O., Osman, A., Long, K., Ghazali, H. 2008. Physicochemical Properties of Cucumis Melo var. Inodorus (Honeydew Melon) Seed and Seed Oil. Journal of Food Lipids, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4522.2007.00101.x

Zhao, X., Guo, Y., Huber, D. J., Lee, J. 2011. Grafting effects on postharvest ripening and quality of 1-methylcyclopropene-treated muskmelon fruit. Scientia Horticulturae vol. 130, no. 3, p. 581-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.08.010

Downloads

Published

2016-11-17

How to Cite

Bobková, A. ., Šnirc, M. ., Král, M. ., Oštádalová, M. ., Pokorná, J. ., Fekete, T. ., & Belej, Ľubomí­r . (2016). Texture quality of muskmelons (Cucumis melo L.) From different retailers during storage. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 10(1), 578–584. https://doi.org/10.5219/668

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>